Suburban Scrawl

The rot surrounding these elections has led me to think about nature of Local Government representatives. What is it that we really want to see in a person who will be paid $100,000 a year to fight over footpaths and where you can place a sign? I come back to notions such as:

1) A moderate level of services for a moderate cost. There is always this unfeasible demand for services but anger at rising rates. I prefer a low to moderate level of services and low rates. I accept that there is no such thing as a free lunch. Where does the candidate sit?

2) A lack of corruption. Will strange and wonderful favours result from campaign donations to the candidate? Will developments with glaring drainage, erosion or similar problems from the right people be supported by the candidate? Will the candidate represent constituents or developers?

3) Rising above the filth. The Local Government elections are proving to be a disgusting cesspit of rumours, lies and innuendo. Does the candidate have the moral fibre to avoid the muck, play a straight bat, and rise above the filth?

4) Dignity and respect. Will the candidate treat their constituents, community workers and business leaders with respect and dignity? Has the candidate done so in the past? Has the candidate done so during this campaign?

5) Caring about their community. Does the candidate have a genuine love and affection for their community and the people in it? Have they been active outside of the election campaign? The candidate should be open, accessible and interested in your community.

Local Government authorities deal with relatively small biscuits. Party ideology has at best a minor influence on the actions of elected Local Government representatives. Dare I say, I am leaning towards thinking that the quality of the candidate may be more important than party colours on the Local Government front.

# posted by Stuart Anthony Fenech : 20:27